Commercial Lease Dispute in Brisbane: Should You Choose Mediation or Litigation?
Summary
A commercial lease dispute in Brisbane rarely needs to end in court. Mediation, expert determination and litigation each suit different problems. This guide sets out a practical decision pathway for landlords and tenants weighing cost, speed, confidentiality and the value of the relationship at stake.
Key Takeaways
- Most commercial lease disputes settle before a hearing, so the real question is which process gets you there fastest and cheapest.
- Mediation is private, faster and preserves the commercial relationship, but produces a binding outcome only if the parties agree.
- Litigation delivers an enforceable judgment and is sometimes unavoidable, but it is slower, public and costly.
- Retail shop leases in Queensland carry a statutory mediation pathway that often must be tried before a tribunal hearing.
- The right choice turns on urgency, the relationship, the amount at stake and whether you need a precedent or just a result.

- 1.Where the decision really sits
- 2.What each pathway delivers
- 3.Step 1: Identify what kind of dispute you have
- 4.Step 2: Weigh speed, cost and confidentiality
- 5.Step 3: Assess the relationship and the endgame
- 6.Step 4: Test whether you need a binding precedent
- 7.Step 5: Sequence the pathways sensibly
- 8.Where litigation is the right first move
- 9.A word on costs risk
- 10.Frequently Asked Questions
A commercial lease dispute in Brisbane rarely needs to end in court. Mediation, expert determination and litigation each suit different problems. This guide sets out a practical decision pathway for landlords and tenants weighing cost, speed, confidentiality and the value of the relationship at stake.
Where the decision really sits
A commercial lease dispute is usually framed as a fight to be won in court. For most Brisbane landlords and tenants it is the wrong starting point. The real decision is procedural: which pathway resolves the problem with the least cost, delay and collateral damage.
The overwhelming majority of lease disputes settle before any hearing. That makes the choice between mediation and litigation less about who is right and more about how you want to reach an outcome. This guide sets out the trade-offs and a practical decision pathway.
What each pathway delivers
Mediation is a confidential, without prejudice process in which an independent mediator helps the parties negotiate their own settlement. The mediator does not decide who wins. Nothing is binding unless the parties sign terms of settlement. Its strengths are speed, privacy and the preservation of an ongoing commercial relationship.
Litigation is the formal court or tribunal process that ends in a binding, enforceable decision imposed by a judge or member. Its strength is finality and the power to compel an outcome. Its weaknesses are cost, delay and the fact that proceedings are generally public.
For many Queensland retail shop leases there is a third feature to factor in. The Retail Shop Leases Act 1994 (Qld) establishes a statutory dispute process under which a retail tenancy dispute is generally referred to mediation administered through the Queensland Small Business Commissioner before it can proceed to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. In those cases mediation is not just an option. It is often a required step.
Step 1: Identify what kind of dispute you have
Start by characterising the problem. Is it a rent arrears claim, a repair or make good dispute, a disagreement over a rent review, an alleged breach of an exclusivity clause or a dispute about termination and re-entry? The nature of the dispute drives the available pathways. A retail shop lease dispute attracts the statutory mediation route. A pure debt recovery claim may be better suited to a court money claim. An urgent dispute about possession may need an injunction only a court can grant.
Step 2: Weigh speed, cost and confidentiality
Mediation is typically measured in weeks, and a session is often a single day. Litigation is measured in months, sometimes longer once interlocutory steps, disclosure and a hearing are added. Mediation costs are usually a fraction of a contested hearing. Mediation is private. Court files and judgments are generally accessible. If your business cannot afford a public dispute with a key supplier, landlord or anchor tenant, that weighs heavily toward mediation.
Step 3: Assess the relationship and the endgame
Ask whether you will still be dealing with the other side after the dispute. A tenant with years left on the term, or a landlord who wants the tenant to stay and keep paying, has a strong reason to protect the relationship. Mediation allows outcomes a court cannot order, such as a rent variation, a staged repayment, a deed of surrender on agreed terms or a refurbishment plan. If the relationship is finished and you simply need an enforceable judgment, litigation may be the more direct route.
Step 4: Test whether you need a binding precedent
Mediation resolves the dispute in front of you, but it sets no precedent and creates no public ruling. If you genuinely need a determination of a contested legal point, for example the proper construction of an unusual clause that will recur across a portfolio, a court decision has value a private settlement does not. This is the narrower case, but it is real.
Step 5: Sequence the pathways sensibly
These options are not mutually exclusive. A common and sensible sequence is to attempt mediation first, keeping the right to litigate if it fails. For retail shop leases that sequencing is largely built into the statutory process. Even outside that regime, a court will generally look favourably on parties who have made a genuine attempt to resolve the matter, and an early settlement saves the cost of a contested hearing. You can read more about how we approach contested matters on our dispute resolution and litigation page.
Where litigation is the right first move
Sometimes going straight to court is appropriate. Urgent injunctive relief to prevent an unlawful re-entry or lockout cannot be obtained at mediation. A clear, undisputed debt may be more efficiently pursued as a money claim. And where a limitation period is about to expire, filing may be necessary to preserve rights. In each case mediation can still run in parallel.
A word on costs risk
In court proceedings the unsuccessful party is often ordered to pay a portion of the successful party's costs. That risk cuts both ways and should temper any confidence about the merits. Mediation removes the exposure, because the parties control the outcome and usually bear their own costs. For a sense of how we structure fees for these matters, see our pricing page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to try mediation before going to court in Queensland?
For most retail shop lease disputes, effectively yes. The Retail Shop Leases Act 1994 (Qld) directs retail tenancy disputes through a mediation process, generally administered via the Queensland Small Business Commissioner, before QCAT will hear the matter. For non-retail commercial leases there is usually no statutory requirement, although the lease itself may contain a dispute resolution clause that must be followed.
Is a mediated settlement legally binding?
Yes, once it is recorded in signed terms of settlement or a deed. The mediation itself is not binding, but the agreement the parties reach can be enforced like any contract. That is why documenting the settlement properly matters.
How long does a commercial lease dispute take to resolve?
A mediated resolution can happen within weeks of the dispute crystallising. Contested litigation generally takes considerably longer once the formal steps are completed. The actual timeframe depends on the complexity of the dispute and the cooperation of the parties.
Can I switch from mediation to litigation if mediation fails?
Yes. Mediation is conducted on a without prejudice basis, so what is said cannot generally be used against you later. If no agreement is reached, you keep your right to pursue the matter through the tribunal or the courts.
Who pays for the mediation?
The parties usually share the mediator's fees and bear their own legal costs, though this can be varied by agreement. That shared, capped cost is one reason mediation is often far cheaper than a contested hearing.
This is general information, not advice on your situation. If you are facing a commercial lease dispute and want help choosing the right pathway, get in touch or call (07) 4270 8880.
Sources and References
- LegislationRetail Shop Leases Act 1994 (Qld)
- LegislationQueensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
- LegislationProperty Law Act 2023 (Qld)
- RegulatorQueensland Small Business Commissioner
This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. While we take reasonable care to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, we make no representations or warranties as to its completeness, currency or reliability. We accept no liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of, or reliance on, this website's content. You should always seek professional advice tailored to your specific circumstances before acting on any information in this article. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.